MIAME is the abbreviation of "Minimum Information About a Microarray Experiment", (www.mged.org/miame) which is established by Microarray Gene Expression Data (MGED) Society. MGED is an international organization of microarray reserchers (biologists, computer scienticsts, stasticians) that are developing microarray data quality standards to promote the sharing of microarray resources generated by functional genomics and proteomics high throughput study.
Nature and the Lancet regard MIAME checklist as a requirement for publishing microarray papers.
MIAME CHECKLIST
MGED Guide |
Notes |
Manuscript |
Supplementary website |
|
| Experiment Design | Type of Experiment | 1) osteoblasts vs. osteocytes; 2) osteoblasts or osteocytes at different cell-communication status; 3) osteoblasts or osteocytes subjected to fluid flow; 4) osteoblasts vs. osteocytes when subjected to fluid flow. (More details ...) | ||
| Experimental factors | 1) cell-communication status; 2) fluid flow; 3) short or long term after fluid flow. (More details ...) | |||
| The number of hybridizations performed | Triplicate hybridization for each experimental condition |
|||
| The type of reference used for the hybridizations | (If any) | |||
| Hybridization design | (If applicable) a description of the comparisons in each hybridization -- to a standard reference sample? Between experimental sammples? (diagram or table may be useful) | |||
| Quality control steps taken | 1) For each experimental factors: two or three replication of hybridization performed; 2) For each chip: housekeeping genes, cDNA synthesis control spots, negative controls (phage λ DNA). | |||
| URL of supplemental websites / database | ||||
| Samples | The origin / characteristics of the biological samples | 1) 2T3 osteoblast-osteocyte differentiation cell model (from transgenic mouse containing BMP-2 promoter driving the SV-40 T antigen transgene; 2) MLO-Y4 osteocyte-like cell model (from mouse containing osteocalcin promoter driving T-antigen). (More details ...) | ||
| Manipulation of biological samples & protocols | 1) 2T3 was cultured in α-MEM with 10% FBS; 2) MLO-Y4 was cultured in α-MEM with 5% FBS and 5% CS
on collagen -coated surfaces; 3) fluid flow. (More details ...)
|
|||
| Protocols for preparing the hybridization extracts | 1) Cells were lysed in RNA-Bee(Tel-test), then the RNA was obtained from chloroform separation, precipitated by isopropanol and washed with ethanol; 2) Poly-A+ RNA; 3) Purification protocol | |||
| Labeling protocols | ||||
| External controls | ||||
| Hybridization procedures & parameters | Hybridization | |||
| Blocking | ||||
| Washing | ||||
| Measurement data & specifications | Type of scanning hardware | Clontech (BD Biosciences, Palo Alto, CA.). (More details ...) | ||
| Type of scanning software | Packard Cyclone Phosphoimager using Super Resolution Type SR screen Optiquant. (More details ...) | |||
| Type of image analysis software | AtlasImage 2.7beta (BD Biosciences, Palo Alto, CA.). (More details ...) | |||
| A description of the measurements produced by the image-analysis software | 16-bit super resolution phosphorimaging tif files. (More details ...) | |||
| A description of the measurements used in the analysis | ||||
| The complete output of the image analysis (spot quantitation matrices) | (link) | |||
| Data selection / transformation procedures | (link) | |||
| Gene expression data tables after normalization | (link) | |||
| Final gene expression data tables based on that the authors make the conclusions | (link) | |||
| Array Design | General | Platform type? Surface/Coating specifications? The availability of the array? | ||
| Each feature (spot) on the array | Its location on the array? ID of its respective reporter? | |||
| Each reporter | Its type? Its information / characteristics -- database references, sequence (if available)? | |||
| Commercial arrays | Manufacturer information -- catalogue#; website? | |||
Experiment Design
Type of experiment:

For our microarray experiments, we investigate the answers of the questions:
1. How gene expression differs between osteoblasts and osteocytes?
2. How gene expression
changes when osteoblasts or osteocytes are at different cell-communication status?
3. How gene expression changes when osteoblasts or osteocytes are subjected to fluid flow?
3. How gene expression changes differ between osteoblasts and osteocytes when they are both subjected to fluid flow?
(Details as intepreted in the paper)
Experimental factors:
(Details as intepreted in the method part of the paper)
The number of hybridizations performed:
Triplicate hybridization for each experimental condition
(Details as intepreted in the method part of the paper)
The type of reference used for the hybridizations:
Hybridization design:
Quality control steps taken:
URL of supplemental website:
Samples
The origin / characteristics of the biological sample:
2T3 osteoblast-osteocyte differentiation cell model
Manipulation of biological samples & protocols:
2T3 cells were cultured in α-MEM supplemented with 10% FBS. The cells were incubated in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37˚C
Protocols for preparing the hybridization extracts:
Labeling protocols:
External controls :
Hybridization procedures & parameters
Hybridization
Blocking
Washing
Measurement data and specifications
Type of scanning hardware
Type of scanning software
Type of image analysis software
A description of the measurements produced by the image-analysis software
A description of the measurements used in the analysis
The complete output of the image analysis (spot quantitation matrices)
Data selection / transformation procedures
Gene expression data tables after normalization
Final gene expression data tables based on that the authors make the conclusions
Array design
General
Each reporter
Commercial arrays
| MIAME |